Ex parte DUNNING et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-1151                                                          
          Application 08/380,824                                                      



                    We reverse the rejection of claims 10, 3 through 5,               
          7, and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Avery in view of Hertz.                                                     
                    At the outset, we point out that we fully comprehend              
          the examiner’s assessment and application of the relied upon                
          teachings of the Avery and Hertz patents.  However, for the                 
          reasons set forth infra, we do not conclude that the claimed                
          invention would have been obvious based upon the evidence                   
          before us, as did the examiner.                                             


                    Independent claim 10 is drawn to an apparatus which               
          comprises, in combination, inter alia, a wall mounted                       
          dispenser, with two spaced side supports, normally employed to              
          support and dispense a conventional roll of toilet tissue                   
          having a central core, a receptacle having a receptacle                     
          interior in the form of an open-topped trough for                           
          accommodating a coreless roll of toilet tissue, first and                   
          second projections on outer receptacle side                                 
          surfaces with at least one of the projections being movable                 



                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007