Appeal No. 97-1182
Application No. 08/150,371
CONCLUSION
We have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C.
102(b) or the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph.
We also have not sustained the rejection of claims 3, 4, 11,
13, 14, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 but we have sustained
the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. 101.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH )
13
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007