Appeal No. 97-1227
Application 08/163,416
display data is stored in the memory associated with
the remote processor. (Emphasis added.)
Original claim 1 filed with the specification recites language
similar to the foregoing. It should be noted that the term
"common to both" specifies the intersection between the two,
which is the action field and not the entire window display.
For all of the foregoing reasons, claims 1-4 are herein
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing
to particularly define and distinctly claim that subject
matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
as being anticipated by Eagen is reversed.
The rejection of claims 2 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Eagen is reversed.
Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), claims 1 and 3 are herein
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by
Eagen.
Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), claims 1-4 are herein
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007