THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM F. PINELL and WILLIAM M. SALUKE
__________
Appeal No. 97-1452
Application 07/876,1051
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3 and 5. Claim 6 is also pending, but has been indicated
by the examiner as containing allowable subject matter.
1Application for patent filed April 30, 1992. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/339,972, filed April 18, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007