Appeal No. 97-1473 Application 08/492,376 the claims of appellant's prior patent are silent as to whether the numbered disks set forth therein actually include numbers on both of the opposite sides or faces of the disks. However, given that the case as defined in these claims is completely trans-parent, that is, it has a first transparent cover, a transparent platform, and a second transparent cover, we consider that the teachings of Stebing at column 5, lines 26-28 (noted above) would have made it obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the numbered disks of the case defined in claims 1 through 4, 11, 13 and 15 of the '567 patent with identical numbers on the opposite faces of each disk. While we recognize that the lottery number picker of the enumerated claims in appellant's prior patent is intended to receive a thin card in the lower space therein, we also note that the lottery number picker does not include such a card in the lower space during its manufacture, shipping or distribution, and that the insertion of such a card, even after purchase, is entirely optional with the purchaser. Thus, in at least some cases, the card would not be inserted 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007