THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WATARU OUCHI, TAIZO MORITA and SHINYA TAGAWA
________________
Appeal No. 97-1621
Application 08/073,5861
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1 through
4 and 6 through 16, all of the claims pending in the application.
The invention relates to “a continuous cutter for severing
pieces of equal length from a coiled elongate article, for
example an extruded aluminum tubular article used to prepare heat
1Application for patent filed June 8, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007