THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THERESA A. MAUDIE, DAVID J. MONK and TIMOTHY S. SAVAGE
____________
Appeal No. 97-1625
Application No. 08/415,9001
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 8-12 and 23-31. Claims 1-7 and 13-22 have been
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected
invention.
1Application for patent filed April 3, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007