THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DOUGLAS D. DEMASI
__________
Appeal No. 97-1702
Application 08/355,5991
___________
REHEARING
___________
Before MEISTER, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
The appellant requests that we reconsider our decision
mailed on March 31, 1998 wherein we (1) affirmed the rejection
of claims 6, 7, 16 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), (2)
affirmed the rejection of claims 8 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. §
103, (3) reversed the rejections of claims 9-15, 19 and 20
1 Application for patent filed December 14, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007