THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GILBERT Y. CHAN and KENNETH G. PRESTON
________________
Appeal No. 97-1703
Application 08/382,4321
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McQUADE, NASE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 9 through
12, all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed February 2, 1995. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
08/048,575, filed April 15, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,414,555,
issued May 9, 1995, which is a continuation of Application
07/820,010, filed January 13, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007