THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID H. HAYNES
__________
Appeal No. 97-1775
Application No. 08/500,7401
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 8 to 10, all the claims remaining in the application . 2
1Application for patent filed July 11, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
08/351,203 filed November 30, 1994, now abandoned.
2Following the final rejection of claims 1 to 7,
appellant, by amendment filed on June 27, 1996 (Paper No. 9),
cancelled claims 1 to 7 and added claims 8 to 10, which are
stated to be claims 5, 6 and 7, respectively, rewritten in
independent form.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007