Ex parte PICKLE - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2145                                                          
          Application 08/566,120                                                      




                    Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as               
          being anticipated by Colbert.                                               


                    Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being            
          unpatentable over Colbert.                                                  


                    The full text of the examiner's rejections and response           
          to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer                
          (Paper No. 9), while the complete statement of appellant’s                  
          argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 8).                           


                                       OPINION                                        
                    In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this           
          appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered                    












                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007