THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARK D. DALHART, PAUL B. ANDERSON
and DAVID A. DAMICO
________________
Appeal No. 97-2244
Application 07/986,5211
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal, filed in response to the final rejection dated
February 15, 1996 (Paper No. 17), involves rejected claims 28,
29, 31 and 51. Claims 27 and 34 stand allowed. Claims 30 and 53
through 56, the only other claims pending in the application,
have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter but
1Application for patent filed December 7, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007