Appeal No. 97-2313
Application 29/024,479
(European document)
The following rejections are before us for review.
The design claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Weber in view of Miller, Loederer, and
Sink.
The design claim further stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Weber in view of Gelli and
Sink.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
(Paper No. 17), while the complete statement of appellant’s
argument can be found in the revised main, reply, and
supplemental briefs (Paper Nos. 25, 18, and 20).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this
appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered
appellant’s specification, drawing, and design claim, the
hereto.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007