Appeal No. 97-2414
Application 08/417,303
With respect to the examiner’s rejections of dependent
claims 3, 6, 10, 11, 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 relying
on obvious design choice, we agree with appellants’ position
as set forth on pages 11-14 of the brief, and for those
additional reasons will not sustain the examiner’s rejections
of claims 3, 6, 10, 11, 15 and 16.
As should be apparent from the foregoing, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 19 of the present
application is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
of a heat exchanger (perhaps one like that of Chao-Fan Chu, Figure 17).
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007