THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM H. VERMEER, ROBERT W. DAMSTETTER
and WILLIAM E. RYAN IV
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2480
Application 08/296,1221
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
COHEN and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claim 14, a new claim entered into the application
subsequent to the final rejection. This claim is the sole
Application for patent filed August 25, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007