THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM F. CHARRON, EDWARD A. KRUPOTICH,
GEORGE H. BINGHAM and JAMES R. SENCENBAUGH
________________
Appeal No. 97-2547
Application 07/949,0421
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL AND ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
This application is before us for a decision on the
1Application for patent filed September 22, 1992.
According to appellants, the application is a division of
Application 07/695,435, filed May 3, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,156,515, issued October 20, 1992, which is a continuation of
Application 07/346,647, filed May 3, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007