THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GORAN LUKIC and EUGEN HOFMANN
____________
Appeal No. 97-2551
Application 08/249,8211
____________
HEARD: JUNE 9, 1998
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 11-34. Claims 1-10 have been
canceled. Appellant’s claimed subject matter is self-
Application for patent filed May 26, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007