THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AUDREY CONTENTE,
BRUCE F. ROSS
and
RICHARD C. POTTER
____________
Appeal No. 97-2555
Application No. 08/215,0621
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 4 to 16, 19 to 23, 82, 86, 87, 91 to 93
and 97, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1 Application for patent filed March 21, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007