THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GUNTER KEINTZEL, HORST-DIETER OLDENBURG,
MANFRED SCHMITZ-GOEB and KARL-HEINZ DINSTUHLER
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2594
Application 08/444,3891
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
11 and 15. Claims 2 to 10, 12 to 14, 16, 17 and 19 to 26, the
other claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn
from consid-eration as being directed to nonelected species.
Application for patent filed May 19, 1995.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007