THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ALFRED BEIER, DIETRICH DISTLER,
HELMUT WITTKE, CHRISTIAN NESSELRATH
________________
Appeal No. 97-2605
Application 08/272,7821
________________
HEARD: JUNE 9, 1998
________________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 5, 8 and
9. Claim 10, which has been indicated as reciting allowable
subject matter, presumably stands objected to as depending from a
rejected base claim. Claims 6 and 7, the only other claims
1Application for patent filed July 8, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007