THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARC E. RICHELSOPH, KENNETH W. RUSSELL,
ROY D. BLOEBAUM and RICHARD E. JONES
____________
Appeal No. 97-2606
Application No. 08/017,5681
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 9. Claims 8 and 13
through 43 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR
Application for patent filed February 16, 1993.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007