Ex parte JUNTWAIT et al. - Page 4




               Appeal No. 97-2619                                                                                                    
               Application 08/104,461                                                                                                


                       the contacts of either . . . [Bruni or Shindo] in an oval shape thus would have been                          
                       obvious, for better engagement between the insulation and the contact.  The oval shape                        
                       thus would allow closer spacing between the contacts.  [Final rejection, page 2.]                             

                       In responding to appellants’ argument in the brief, the examiner acknowledges on pages 3-4 of                 

               the answer that in Beyer the oval shaped crimp section is for the conductor of the wire rather than the               

               insulation jacket, and that there is no disclosure at all in Beyer of crimping a wider insulation jacket of a         

               wire into an oval configuration.  Nevertheless, the examiner posits that                                              

                       it also would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form the insulation                    
                       crimping portion of the male contact of either Bruni er al or Shindo et al as an oval                         
                       shape . . . to allow for a reliable connection with the conductor [sic, insulation jacket].                   
                       Clearly, it would have been desirable to have a reliable connection between the contact                       
                       and both the wire conductor itself and the surrounding insulation.  [Answer, page 4.]                         

                       The examiner’s position is not well taken.  Like appellants, we find no teaching whatsoever in                

               Beyer of crimping an insulation jacket to a contact, much less a teaching of crimping an insulation jacket            

               to a contact with a crimp barrel that is oval in its final configuration.  While Beyer teaches that the               

               disclosed conductor crimp of oval configuration is advantageous as a conductor connection because it                  

               prevents nicks to the conductor and protects the connection from the deleterious effects of aggressive                

               substances (translation, pages 2 and 3), it is not clear to us that these considerations would apply to a             

               crimp connection for the insulating jacket of a wire as well.  In short, it is not at all apparent to us that         

               the ordinarily skilled artisan would consider Beyer’s oval conductor crimp portion to be of any benefit               

               in terminating the insulation jacket of a wire.  Where prior art references require a selective combination           


                                                                 4                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007