Appeal No. 97-2722 Page 4 Application No. 08/329,840 Claims 1, 2, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds and Laiti. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds and Laiti as applied to claims 1 and 2 above, and further in view of the French reference 112,504, Zopfi, Dworman, and Silverman. Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds, Laiti, the French reference 112,504, Zopfi, Dworman, and Silverman as applied to claims 1 and 4 above, and further in view of Bass. Claims 1, 2, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the French reference 112,504 in view of Edmonds and Laiti. invention.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007