THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HELMUTH SOKOLEAN ____________ Appeal No. 97-2782 Application No. 08/368,9931 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, PATE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 26 through 40 and 42 through 46, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2 1Application for patent filed January 5, 1995. 2It would appear from the status of amendments sections of both the brief and the answer that the appellant'sPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007