Appeal No. 97-2902 Application No. 08/170,332 be interpreted by one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the pertinent art. Id. The appellant has explained in the specification the dynamics of the forces which act upon the class of vehicles to which his invention is directed, as well as the problem and the solution that his invention provides. We agree with the examiner that this does not explicitly include an explanation of the effect of the height and weight of the rider upon the center of gravity of the “vehicle and rider assembly.” However, the guidance we have received from our reviewing court, stated above, does not limit us to looking to the specification for an understanding of the words of the claims. It directs that the language of the claims be interpreted from the perspective of one of ordinary skill in the art. In our view, the appellant has established that one of ordinary skill in the art would have known that the position of positive and negative acceleration in a horizontal direction is that which is shown in Exhibit 4, and would have possessed sufficient knowledge and skill to determine the height of the center of gravity of the vehicle and rider assembly when in such a position. Of particular interest are the explanations regarding the negligible effect 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007