Appeal No. 97-2903 Application No. 08/492,643 Claim 18 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 18. A data transmitting apparatus for transmitting predetermined data, comprising: partial scramble means for scrambling a selected portion of the predetermined data using a first key; entire scramble means for entirely scrambling all of the predetermined data, using a second key, after the selected portion has been scrambled; sending means for transmitting the entirely scrambled predetermined data via a first transmission path; and means for sending the first key via a second transmission path. Claims 18 through 34 stand rejected under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which appellant regards as the invention. Reference is made to the final rejection, the briefs and the answer for the respective positions of the appellant and the examiner. OPINION The indefiniteness rejection is reversed. The examiner indicates (final rejection, page 2) that the uses of “partial scramble means,” “entire scramble means,” 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007