Ex parte WRIGHT et al. - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                                                   
                                today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                                                     
                                journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                Paper No. 15                                                                           

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                        Ex parte RICHARD B. WRIGHT and KENNETH MILLIGAN                                                                                                
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 97-2911                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/399,8361                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                     Before STAAB, NASE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                    
                     STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection                                                                                               
                     of claims 3, 9 and 10, all the claims then remaining in the                                                                                                       
                     application.  Subsequent to the final rejection, appellants                                                                                                       



                                1Application for patent filed March 7, 1995.                                                                                                           
                                                                                         -1-                                                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007