THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HERBERT TRATZ, REINER ENGELHARDT
and GEORG LOSEL
____________
Appeal No. 97-2912
Application No. 08/291,7681
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 6 through 15. Claims 6, 13 and 15
were amended subsequent to the final rejection. Claims 1
1Application for patent filed August 17, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a national stage
application of PCT/DE93/00119, filed February 11, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007