Appeal No. 97-3085
Application 08/236,835
afforded by the claims in Applications 08/236,838, 08/236,809
and 08/236,069 (Patent No. 5,577,963). The examiner’s
determination to the contrary as set forth in the answer is
fundamentally flawed in that it fails to take into account the
subject matter as a whole recited in these claims.
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the examiner’s double
patenting rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 10 through 13
and 16 through 21.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007