THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HONG Y. SHEN, RUI R. ZENG, YU P. ZHOU, GUI F. YU, CHENG H. HUANG, ZHENG D. ZENG, WEN X. LIN and RUI F. WU ____________ Appeal No. 97-3136 Application No. 08/312,7801 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. 1Application for patent filed September 27, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007