Appeal No. 97-3218
Application 08/541,947
No. 9) , and from the final rejection of claims 2 and 7.2
However, in the answer (page 2), the examiner, in effect,
withdrew the final rejection of claims 2 and 7 by indicating
that they are allowed. Claims 3 through 6 and 8 through 14,
all of the other claims in the application, likewise have been
allowed by the examiner. Based upon the above, only the
rejection of claim 1 is before us on appeal.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an adjustable
prefabricated drywall corner. Claim 1 reads as follows.
An adjustable prefabricated drywall corner
comprising, in combination, a plurality of
substantially flat sides foldably attached
to form at least two seams, one of said
flat sides adjustably foldable to form a
third seam at a chosen angle with respect
to said orthogonal seams.
As evidence of anticipation, the examiner relies upon the
document specified below.
Rillo 3,350,825 Nov. 07, 1967
2On page 1 of the answer (Paper No. 12), the examiner indicated that
the amendment would be entered.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007