Appeal No. 97-3345 Application 08/332,936 iron pipes; column 8, lines 56 through 61) and Nemoto (cast iron or steel pipes; column 1, lines 13 and 14) are viewed as representative of the knowledge in the art of the known method of trenchless excavation pipelaying, as acknowledged by appellant (specification, pages 2 and 3). Considering the applied teachings as a whole, we conclude, as did the examiner, that it would have been obvious to practice the invention of McGugan with the pipes being placed horizontally in the earth. It readily appears to us that the incentive on the part of one having ordinary skill in the art for making this modification would have simply been to gain the expected benefits of the well-known trenchless excavation method. The argument in the brief (pages 20 through 22) is not convincing of the patentability of claim 35. Akin to our analysis of the patents to Sweeney and St. Onge, supra, we 12Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007