Appeal No. 97-3575
Application 08/380,815
the tubing is coiled, nor is there an opening that the tubing
support is dimensioned to close. These deficiencies are not
cured by either of the two secondary references.
Thus, the references also fail to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness with regard to the subject matter recited
in claim 11, and we will not sustain the rejection of claim 11
or of dependent claims 13-16.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007