Appeal No. 97-3671
Application 08/266,977
For the foregoing reasons, we do not sustain the
rejection of claims 8-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the
examiner’s applied prior art or otherwise presumably over
Milnes, Langhans, Clark, and Pfost.
Conclusion
The examiner’s rejection of claims 8-15 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over certain applied references,
or alternatively, over Milnes, Langhans, Clark and Pfost, is
reversed.
REVERSED
JOHN C. MARTIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
POLAROID CORPORATION
Patent Dept.
549 Technology Square
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007