THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ARVIND PATEL, WILLIAM R. LENZ,
KEN GRAMBLEY, JACK J. SCHAFER, DANIEL M. PRESCOTT,
GLEN ELLYN and CHARLES T. WALSH
________________
Appeal No. 97-3682
Application 08/491,4581
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 4, 7, 9, 15 and 16, all the claims currently pending in
the application.
1Application for patent filed June 16, 1995. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/241,383, filed, May 11, 1994, now U. S. Patent No.
5,453,028, issued September 26, 1995.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007