Appeal No. 97-3707
Application 08/595,910
Thus, the examiner’s conclusion that the differences
between the subject matter recited in claims 9 through 12 and
the applied prior art are such that the subject matter as a
whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was
made to a person having ordinary skill in the art is not well
founded. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103 rejections of these claims.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
)
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007