Appeal No. 97-3714 Application 08/471,664 Thus, the examiner’s determination that the subject matter recited in the appealed claim (1) is anticipated by the teachings of Robinson and (2) would have been obvious in view of the combined teachings of Sarh and Ross is not well taken. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections of this claim. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED BRUCE H. STONER, JR. Chief ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JPM/pgg Lawrence W. Nelson 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007