THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEITH F. WOODRUFF
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3718
Application 08/480,5791
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, MEISTER and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
The appellant requests we reconsider our decision mailed
on August 11, 1998 wherein we (1) reversed the rejection of
claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a), (2) affirmed the rejection
of claims 1-3 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), (3) affirmed
1 Application for patent filed June 7, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007