Appeal No. 97-3752 Page 6 Application No. 08/293,322 that the invention is patentable, resort to speculation, unfounded assumption or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factual basis for the rejection. See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968). Townsend discloses an apparatus for removing the fat and the skin from a ham. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the apparatus includes a feed roll 14 provided with grooves 15 and teeth 16, a pressure shoe 18, a skinning blade 20 and a fatting attachment having a fatting blade 21. As shown in Figure 1, the fatting blade 21 is slanted from one side of the apparatus to the other side of the apparatus. In addition, as shown in dotted lines in Figure 2, it is desirable to have the fatting blade 21 nearly contact the skinning blade 20. Townsend teaches (column 2, lines 5-11) that (1) in addition to skinning hams, it is quite often desirable to "fat" them (i.e., remove fat from the ham), (2) the fatting of ham is usually performed either is some other machine or by hand, and (3) the fatting attachment permits fatting the ham simultaneously with the skinning operation.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007