THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN R. FRANZINI
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3755
Application 08/079,3381
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
John R. Franzini (the appellant) appeals from the rejection of claims 17 and 19. Claims 1- 2
16 stand allowed. Claims 18, 20 and 21, the only other claims present in the application, have3
been indicated as be allowable subject to the requirement that they be rewritten to include all the
1Application for patent filed June 18, 1993.
2Claims 17 and 19 have been “twice rejected” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 134.
3The final rejection of claims 10, 11, 14 and 16 was withdrawn by the examiner in the
answer (see page 2).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007