THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte K. REED JENTZSCH, OTIS H. WILLOUGHBY and
GARY A. BALDWIN
__________
Appeal No. 97-3757
Application 08/298,3511
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 53, 56
to 64, 67 to 75, 78 to 87 and 90 to 111, all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed August 29, 1994. According to appellants,
this application is a continuation of application no. 08/031,059, filed March
2, 1993, abandoned, which is a continuation of application 07/600,942, filed
October 22, 1990, abandoned, which is a continuation of application
07/505,618, filed April 6, 1990, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007