Appeal No. 97-3917
Application 08/467,650
the dielectric film. That lends further support to our view
that the second-layer electrode need not confront the second
capacitor electrode through the dielectric film interposed
therebetween.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the appellant’s admitted prior art,
Takahashi, Torii, and Koyama is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the appellant’s admitted prior art,
Takahashi, Torii, Koyama, and Anand is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under
37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Michael R. Fleming )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007