Ex parte SMITH - Page 2




                   Appeal No. 97-3983                                                                                                                               
                   Application 08/506,851                                                                                                                           


                   through 20.                                                                                                                                      
                            The invention relates to a “cartlike sanitation apparatus adapted to receive liquid                                                     
                   waste, as from hospital patients, for transport to a nearby disposal site for draining                                                           
                   discharge” (specification, page 1).  Claims 9 and 13, the two independent claims                                                                 
                   remaining on appeal, are illustrative and read as follows:                                                                                       
                            9.  In mobile sanitation apparatus having housing means, the improvement                                                                
                   comprising temporarily deformable elastomeric receptor means for a patient’s waste                                                               
                   liquid, tubular means adapted to conduct the waste liquid from the receptor means into a                                                         
                   temporary waste liquid storage compartment in the housing means, and rinse means for                                                             
                   rinsing clean the waste liquid path from the receptor means into the storage compartment.                                                        
                            13.   In mobile sanitation means, the improvement comprising elastomeric receptor                                                       
                   means for waste liquids, having a base with a discharge outlet and having a hollow wall                                                          
                   upstanding surrounding a major part of the base and having an opening into the wall hollow                                                       
                   and openings connected therewith through and along the wall and facing inward therefrom                                                          
                   for rinse water supplied to the hollow to flow down the wall and over the base to the                                                            
                   discharge opening.                                                                                                                               
                            The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of anticipation and                                                              
                   obviousness are:                                                                                                                                 
                   Coffman et al. (Coffman)                            3,192,537                             Jul. 6, 1965                                           
                   Smith                                                          5,117,511                             Jun. 2, 1992                                
                            Claims 13 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                                                        
                   Smith, and claims 9 through 12 and 14 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                            
                   as being unpatentable over Smith in view of Coffman.                                                                                             


                            Reference is made to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 9) and to the examiner’s                                                          

                                                                                 2                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007