THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TOKUJI WATANABE
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3990
Application 08/531,0691
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Tokuji Watanabe (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claim 9, the only claim remaining in the
application.
We REVERSE and, pursuant to our authority under the
1Application for patent filed September 20, 1995. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/165,474, filed December 13,
1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007