THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM P. WARTHEN and JOHN B. MANLY, JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 97-4048
Application 08/371,9341
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 18, 19 and 20, and from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 21 and 22 as amended subsequent to the
Application for patent filed January 12, 1995. According to1
appellants, this application is a divisional of application 08/110,055, filed
August 30, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007