THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROBERT W. CRUM __________ Appeal No. 97-4083 Application 08/422,9331 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Adminstrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Robert W. Crum originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 23, all of the claims pending in the application. In the main brief (Paper No. 9), the appellant states that “[a]ppeal of claims 2 to 6 and 11 to 15 is waived” (page 1). 1Application for patent filed April 17, 1995. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007