Ex parte CRUM - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                                                
                     publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 13                                          

                                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                                
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                                
                                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                              
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                                    Ex parte ROBERT W. CRUM                                                                                            
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                                           Appeal No. 97-4083                                                                                          
                                                                        Application 08/422,9331                                                                                        
                                                                                ___________                                                                                            
                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                                ___________                                                                                            

                     Before McCANDLISH, Senior Adminstrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and McQUADE,                                                                                      
                     Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                                                     
                     McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                Robert W. Crum originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                                        
                     through 23, all of the claims pending in the application.  In the main brief (Paper No. 9), the                                                                   
                     appellant states that “[a]ppeal of claims 2 to 6 and 11 to 15 is waived” (page 1).                                                                                


                                1Application for patent filed April 17, 1995.                                                                                                          
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007