Appeal No. 97-4155
Application No. 08/309,403
prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject
matter of claim 12, and therefore we will not sustain the
rejection of this independent claim.
Independent claim 13 contains the same limitations as
those which were discussed above with regard to claim 12, plus
others. It has been rejected on the same grounds, and its
rejection cannot be sustained for the same reasons.
The Jones reference, cited for its teaching of using
rails instead of wheels as the guide means with regard to
dependent
claims 5 and 6, and of using axially movable locking means
with regard to dependent claims 9 and 10, does not alleviate
the shortcomings in the basic combination.
SUMMARY
None of the rejections are sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007