Ex parte SCHUTZ - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-4168                                                          
          Application 08/348,890                                                      


          Appellant's invention is a sheet metal container specific-                  
          ally designed for the transport and storage of corrosive liquids.           
          Independent claim 7 is representative of the subject matter on              
          appeal and a copy of that claim appears in the Appendix to                  
          appellant's brief.                                                          

          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Mineo                              4,316,318      Feb. 23, 1982             
          Hawkins et al. (Hawkins)           4,896,782      Jan. 30, 1990             
          Büdenbender (Büdenbender ‘576)  5,052,576         Oct. 01, 1991             

          Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Büdenbender ‘576 in view of Hawkins.                      

          Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
          unpatentable over Büdenbender ‘576 in view of Hawkins as applied            
          to claim 7 above, and further in view of Mineo.2                            





               2As noted on page 5 of the examiner’s answer, the rejection of claims 7
          through 9 based on Mineo, Smith and Hawkins found on pages 4 and 5 of the   
          final rejection (Paper No. 11) has been withdrawn by the examiner, and is   
          therefore not before us.                                                    

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007