Appeal No. 97-4206
Application 08/662,263
The examiner's rejections are explained on pages 3-6 of
the answer. The arguments of the appellants and examiner in
support of their respective positions may be found on pages 5-
14 of the brief and pages 6-8 of the answer.
OPINION
We have carefully reviewed the appellants' invention as
described in the specification, the appealed claims, the prior
art applied by the examiner and the respective positions
advanced by the appellants in the brief and by the examiner in
the answer. As a consequence of this review, we make the
following determinations.
Rejection (1)
Initially we note that, with respect to this rejection,
the appellant on page 5 of the brief state that "all of claims
1, 2, 7, 8, and 22 stand or fall together." Accordingly,
these claims will stand or fall with representative claim 1.
37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007