THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RODNEY G. WOLFF and VINCENT W. HULL
_____________
Appeal No. 97-4258
Application No. 08/429,9661
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS
and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 27, 1995. According
to appellants, this application is a divisional of Application
08/171,361, filed December 21, 1993; which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/815,560, filed December 27, 1991,
now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/486,580, filed February 28, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007